Veto Vito (Fossella)

Democrats outnumber Republicans on Staten Island. Democrats outnumber Republicans in Brooklyn. A Republican holds the Staten Island - Brooklyn 13th Congressional District seat in Congress. We want it. Time to veto Vito.

Friday, December 16, 2005

Transit Strike

As with must of us, an all-out transit strike would have messed me up in all kinds of ways, so I have say I breathed a sigh of relief this morning when the subways were still running. I also have to give the union some serious credit on several fronts.

First, the partial strike shows they are serious about their demands, imposes a cost on the city, but with the least possible disruptions to riders.

Second, since the affected bus lines are private, it has the added virtue of avoiding violating the Taylor Law.

Third, and probably most impressively, it seems the sticking point in negotiations is not the package for current workers, but the union's insistence that the next generation of incoming transit workers get at least as much as this generation. At a time when our federal government is lowering taxes on the wealthiest by borrowing money that will have to be paid off by our children and grandchildren, and Republicans want to do away with Social Security's guaranteed lifetime benefit, someone is asking what will our current actions do to those who come after us. That just seems like a position worthy of respect. I'd welcome other thoughts on this topic.

1 Comments:

At 9:58 AM, Anonymous Gg said...

I give them credit for their strategy as well, even before the strike was pushed back. Starting it on a Friday would have pinched the city and shown them they were serious but then led into the weekend for more time to negotiate without serious damage. This as opposed to starting it on a Monday throwing the whole work week into peril. I also agree that not selling out future workers is good principle.

However, I'm not sure their demands are all that reasonable. They want to keep the retirement age at 55 instead of having it moved to 62. Maybe they could have phased in later retirements over a few years, but a 55 retirement doesn't seem that realistic in this day in age anymore. Other fields don't offer that.

Also, a story says they make $47-55k before overtime. That's pretty good money for comparitively unskilled work. 8% raises every year doesn't sound realistic in today's labor market either.

I can't speak to the pension and healthcare changes since I don't know enough about them, but at least on the two points above, the union appears to be overreaching. I'm no conservative, hence I'll be working to oust our friend Vito soon, but I think holding the city hostage for some of these demands makes the union, and thus to some people all unions, look bad.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home